Juerg Feldmann
Fortiori Design LLC
Registered:1355349061 Posts: 1,530
Posted 1375215031
#1
With the increase in interest , mails and orders for MOXY we naturally have an increase in questions on comparison with other equipment. ( NIRS) We discussed the problem of Validation already in length, as well as comparisons. The international MOXY study group we started a while back had three clear goals. 1. Can we repeat and " compare " trends of NIRS equipment. MOXY with one of our favorite equipments ( Portamon) Portamon from the Company Artinis was the break through for us many many years back, as we had a top equipment to be used in the field. We really have most of the information's and experience we have with NI RS collected with Portamon and in basically any tests we do with MOXY we always run as well a Portamon. For top state of the ART facilities the Portamon will be the flag ship but if we combine the Portamon with MOXY we actually now have a information we can use for anybody out there during workouts as it is live on your wrist watch. True there is as well a big price difference between clear above 10'000 $ to below 1'000 $. The beauty is that the knowledge we gained with Portamon no can be moved over to MOXY and as such we open the door for basically any smaller testing facility to offer the same testing options like a big expensive facility . You now can start out with HR and MOXY and increase as you go along your ability of Bio marker assessments. If you have an existing test center and use VO2 testing you add a MOXY and you dramatically will enhance answers to individual peoples ability.. \ We will as well off a Service , where you will be able to sent your test data's and we will help you either once or in a package of more test to see and learn the information's you can move over for your self or for your clients. EUK holding will give you that information over a centrally located facility from Switzerland and we will keep you informed on this as well any MOXY buyers will get the info with his equipment. 2 . The second goal was to collect data's fro " classical' test (3 min step tests) and our change to a homeostasis disruption test HDT or what ever the groups will start to name it . The key was to see, whether the direct information we get instantly from NIRS shows the lag time we unfortunately had with classical equipments like lactate and VO2 information. 3.Develop of the new protocol , offer a service and as well start to get more information on how a NIRS picture may change and can be change with different training stimuli intervention. This is ongoing and with the new MOXY owners increasing daily we hope to keep a central data bank so we are able to actually understand, what kind of oxygenation deoxygenation stress will have what kind of functional and structural reactions and out come . Here a very small snide view from the incredible huge amount of data collection done by Next Level Here a nice example on the 2 clear types of reactions we see in Ice hockey players but as well we saw many years back in endurance athletes. What confused us originally is now a great standard information so we know now, what is the strength from one athlete and what is the strength form the other athlete. This is a nice feature for coaches in team sport to know, wheter this athlete one is great for a double shift or not or how long he can stay on the ice. In endurance sport we know now, whether this athlete can afford to create some sprints in between a race or not. The information's are getting super interesting . Pic shows first our initially open question as we looked at O2 and HHb trend in combination with tHb and TSI / SmO2 trends. Than the same interesting information we can gather with MOXY are ion the last 2 pics.
Attached Images